“BEPARTMENT GF TH
ROARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 8. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2480
arm RIAL PS
Te mmY
DIC
Docket No. NR6066-13
13 Nov 14
|"
This if in reference to your application for correction of your naval)
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
12 November 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser
Wi30C/14U1348 dated 15 October 2014, a copy of which was sent to you
on 18 October 2014; it was returned to sender on 5 November 2014. A
copy is being provided to you low.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
‘establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
Tt is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
De
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
tt « : # “4 SSA bed FOS
Wh de i -o~-rTC-
eo ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure: OCNO Memo 7220 Ser N120C/1401348 dtd 15 Oct 14
Be aes #
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7727 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C/14U1330 dated 10 October 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR7727-13 consequentiy, wher appiyang [or @ correction Of am iliviai ives record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7727 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C/14U1330 dated 10 October 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR7727-13 consequentiy, wher appiyang [or @ correction Of am iliviai ives record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR746 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 duly 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N1i30C/1400651 Gated 27 May 2014, a COpy of which is attached. consequently, when applying for a4 correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8921 13
NR8921-13 te tates oe Te ee to your application for correction of your naval This is in referen 0 uSC 1552. . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5250 13
NR5250-13 1i March 2014 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7118 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 April 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130D/14U1467 of 4 November 2014, a copy of which is attached. However, the Board found that your orders to VP-45 had a Projected Rotation Date (PRD) of November 2015.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9045 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice, In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4814 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application ‘on 10 March 2014. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser N130C/1300997 dated eres a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4752 13
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser Ni30C/13U1038 dated ea, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2152 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser Ni30C/130U1037 dtated We. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.